Abel Forger vs Yannik Kelm Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 21 Jun at 12:27 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Forger vs Y. Kelm

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Forger 1 - 0 Kelm
They have played 2 sets in total, with Abel Forger winning 2 and Yannik Kelm winning 0. The last match between Abel Forger and Yannik Kelm was at the M15 Duffel, 21-06-2025, Round: SF, Surface: Clay, with Abel Forger getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Forger | 1 |
| Kelm | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(SF) M15 Duffel(06-21-25)
A. Forger vs Y. Kelm H2H Profile
A. Forger vs Y. Kelm Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Kelm has outperformed Forger, winning 50.21% of second serve points compared to Forger's 43.79%. Is this a crucial indicator of match outcome? Yes, it often is.
- Return Game Stats: Kelm has an edge on return, securing 51.35% of opponent second serve points versus Forger's 48.79%. For first serves, Kelm leads with 32.29% to Forger's 27.99%.
- Pressure Handling: Both players are close, with Kelm saving 53.33% of breakpoints and Forger at 52.99%. Does this suggest they handle pressure similarly?
- Match Performance: Over the past year, Forger has a higher win rate of 64.18% compared to Kelm's 56.82%, indicating recent consistency for Forger.
- Surface Preference: Kelm excels on indoor hard courts with a 63% win rate, while Forger performs best on hard courts at 63%.
- Event Level: Both players compete primarily in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events, with Forger winning 64.18% of matches compared to Kelm's 58.14%.
- Opponent Quality: Kelm faces tougher opponents with an average rank of 187.95, whereas Forger's average opponent rank is 456.39.
- Deciding Set Performance: Kelm is stronger in deciding sets, winning 63% compared to Forger's 48% success rate.
- Breakpoint Conversion: Kelm slightly edges Forger, converting 36.36% of break chances, while Forger converts 34.51%.
Editorial Prediction (June 21, 2025, UTC):
Both players have their distinct strengths and patterns. Kelm displays impressive performance on second serve points and has a strong track record in returning serves. This gives Kelm a potential edge in situations where tactical play is necessary.
On the other hand, Forger has shown greater consistency in overall match wins over the past year, albeit against less challenging opponents. Despite this, Kelm's ability to hold under pressure and success in deciding sets offer a slight advantage.
Ultimately, when taking all factors into account, Kelm seems to have a slight upper hand in this matchup due to superior second serve and return game statistics, along with better performance under pressure. Therefore, Kelm is the likely winner in this upcoming tennis match.
Abel Forger vs Yannik Kelm Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Forger vs Y. Kelm H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 13 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 2:9:31 | Average Match Time | 2:9:31 |
| 53% (40/76) | 1st Serve % | 48% (33/69) |
| 75% (30/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (16/33) |
| 28% (10/36) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (14/36) |
| 58% (7/12) | Break Pts Won % | 27% (4/15) |
| 57% (39/69) | Return Points Win % | 47% (36/76) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Forger Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 3-6 7-6(4) 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-0 | ||
QF | L | 7-6(6) 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 6-0 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Y. Kelm Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
F | L | 3-6 6-4 7-6(5) | ||
SF | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
QF | W | 0-6 6-3 7-6(9) | ||
R2 | W | 7-5 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-0 | ||

A. Forger vs Y. Kelm Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.39% (62/52) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.00% (57/57) |
| 54.23% (141/119) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.81% (128/129) |
| 53.77% (1297/1115) | Games Win/Loss | 49.71% (1210/1224) |
| 62.00% (31/19) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.00% (12/8) |
| 47.37% (27/30) | Clay Win/Loss | 48.15% (39/42) |
| 57.14% (4/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 46.15% (6/7) |
| 0.25 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 298 | Aces Total | 80 |
| 0.37 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 441 | Total Double Faults | 287 |
| 1:38:51 | Average Match Time | 1:6:35 |
| 446.57 | Average Opponent Rank | 286.04 |
| 62% (4289/6936) | 1st Serve % | 58% (2809/4865) |
| 67% (2884/4289) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (1729/2809) |
| 47% (1234/2647) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (917/2056) |
| 44% (348/786) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (219/521) |
| 42% (2941/6931) | Return Points Win % | 42% (2004/4791) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/4) |
| 54.87% (62/51) | Futures W/L | 52.29% (57/52) |
| 54% (60/111) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (57/114) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (12/25) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (12/22) |
| 44% (15/34) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (15/29) |
| 86% (63/54) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (59/50) |
| 14% (63/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (59/9) |
| 14% (50/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (55/7) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Potential H2H Matches This Week
Forger (M15 Alcala de Henares)
Kelm (M25 Luanda)
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Shintaro Mochizuki vs Federico Arnaboldi Prediction – ATP Bergamo Challenger – 18th November 2025 Best Bets

Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
